Same job, same cost.
Both tools help designers collect, organize, and act on client feedback at $16/mo. SiteViewer adds two things Workflow doesn't: the same review room for HTML files AND live URLs, and a custom domain on review links. Same price. Bigger surface.
No credit card. 5 free previews. 14-day Studio trial covers Client feedback in full.
$16
SiteViewer Studio. Same price as Workflow's per-seat plan, with HTML uploads and a custom domain on review links.
same job, more surface
Both tools land at $16/mo for the matching feature set. The decision isn't price: it's whether you want a feedback tool that handles HTML files AND live URLs in one room, and lets you serve review links from your own studio domain.
Two jobs Workflow doesn't quite finish.
HTML files, not just URLs
Drag a self-contained HTML file in. AI-generated landing pages, Figma exports, hand-coded designs, all reviewable in the same room before they ever go live anywhere. Workflow needs a live URL to point at.
Your own custom domain
White-label every review link with your studio's domain. Clients never see a Workflow URL or someone else's brand. The whole experience reads as yours.
Side by side.
Both tools nail the core (pinned comments on a real page, threads, resolutions). The differences below are what tips the scale.
| SiteViewer | Workflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting pricei | $16/mo (Studio) | $16/seat/mo |
| Squarespace, Webflow, Wix sites | Yes. | Yes. |
| Review any live URL | Paste the URL. | Paste the URL. |
| Custom domain on review linksi | White-labelled. | No. |
| Password-protected previews | Every plan. | Every plan. |
| Version history per project | Yes. | Yes. |
| Passwordless reviewersi | Name once. No password. | Guest mode. Click, type, done. |
| Review HTML filesi | Drag and drop. | No. |
Workflow pricing accurate at time of writing. Check both sites for current rates.
The honest take
Workflow is a solid product. The core experience (pinned comments on a live page, threads, resolutions) is comparable to ours. If you only review live Webflow or Figma sites and you're happy paying monthly for one seat, both tools will do the job.
SiteViewer is the better fit if either of these is true: you sometimes need to review a hand-coded or AI-generated HTML file before it's live anywhere; or you want the review URL on your own domain so clients see your studio brand, not a third-party platform.
If you're already on Workflow and it works, stay. If you're choosing for the first time, both tools offer a 14-day trial with no card. Pick on whether you need HTML uploads or a custom domain on review links.
Already using Workflow? Bring your doc with you.
Paste the share link to any public Workflow doc and the importer pulls every pinned comment, reply, resolution, author and timestamp into a new SiteViewer project. Each unique page gets a full-page snapshot so pins land on the exact element your reviewers commented on, with the original Workflow capture preserved on every thread as the archive view. Threads still resolve. New comments behave like native SiteViewer comments. Your clients pick up where they left off.
Typical 30 to 80 page doc, 60 to 90 seconds. Up to 2000 pages of full-page captures per workspace, free, for the lifetime of the account.
14 days of Studio. Real feedback round. No card.
Run your next review on SiteViewer. Same $16/mo as Workflow after the trial, with HTML uploads and a custom domain on review links built in.